Milirrpum v nabalco property9/18/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() PART A: Answer ONE question from this partQuestion One:Ĭritically evaluate the following extract from the judgment of Blackburn J in Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141 at 171 as a statement of the nature of proprietary interests: You must submit by the due date via Turnitin on the Moodle site for the class AND place a hard copy in the TABL 2972/BENV 2814 Assignment Collection Box in the School of Taxation and Business Law (Quad Building on second level in South Wing).Word limit: 2000 words total i.e. You must comply with the Style Guide which is included in the Course Outline.Datedue: Thursday10September20155.00pm(Week7) Start each of the two questions on a new page and indicate clearly which question you are answering.ħ. Assignments will not be accepted unless a signed cover sheet is attached.Ħ. You must attach the completed cover sheet. ![]() The additional references in Webb & Stephenson and the references lists on Moodle will provide a good starting point.ĥ. In preparing your answers you are required to read more widely than the prescribed readings. You are required to answer two (2) questions from the choices below:Ĥ. It is worth 40% of the overall marks for this course.Ģ. This is a research assignment on key principles of land law. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |